Cervical Cancer: A Staging-Based Treatment Framework

I have treated around ten pediatric patients from Ethiopia specifically, as part of a broader pediatric caseload. Pediatric malignancy needs to be treated very carefully. In medulloblastoma, for example, craniospinal irradiation planning has to be extremely precise to prevent radiation-related toxicity. Because survival in cancers like ependymoma and medulloblastoma is often good, the most important concern becomes preventing secondary malignancy later in life, which means paying close attention to low-dose spillage, or integral dose, across the whole treatment field. For pediatric cases needing long treatment fields, we generally use tomotherapy, and we get very good outcomes.

It depends on the site and the stage. In early-stage head and neck cancer, surgery alone can be sufficient, but high-risk features on post-surgical pathology can still require adjuvant radiotherapy. In locally advanced disease, radiotherapy is generally needed as part of definitive treatment. In stage IV disease, radiotherapy is mostly palliative: relieving pain, bleeding, cord compression or hemoptysis. More than 50 to 60 percent of patients need radiotherapy at some point, whether as radical treatment, adjuvant therapy or palliation, and we rely on a multidisciplinary tumour board to decide the exact timing for each patient.

We follow international guidelines. Using cervical cancer as an example: stage IA, IB and IIA disease is treated with surgery first. Adjuvant treatment then depends on the Sedlis and Peters criteria: positive margins or positive nodes call for concurrent chemoradiation; deep stromal invasion beyond one-third, a tumour over 4 centimetres, or lymphovascular space invasion, without positive margins or nodes, call for radiation alone; if none of those features are present, no adjuvant treatment is needed and the patient goes to follow-up. Locally advanced disease, stage IB3 to IVA, needs concurrent chemoradiation. Stage IVB generally starts with chemotherapy, though a bulky tumour or high nodal burden may call for six weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation. Every site, endometrium, lung, breast, has its own guideline, and we make these calls through tumour board discussion.

They are complementary, not competing. Staging starts with clinical examination: if the tumour looks confined to the cervix, with no fornix or parametrial involvement and a size under 4 centimetres, surgery looks feasible on clinical grounds. MRI is then used specifically to confirm there is no parametrial invasion, which gives us a clinico-radiological diagnosis. Only after surgery does histopathology decide whether adjuvant treatment is needed. This stepwise approach, clinical exam, then imaging, then surgery, then histopathology, is important because operating on an advanced or bulky tumour without confirming operability first raises the risk of a positive margin, which then commits the patient to more aggressive treatment than necessary.

Yes, that is brachytherapy. Historically, cervical cancer brachytherapy used preloaded sources, meaning the source had to be implanted directly. Technology has evolved to after-loading systems: the applicator, such as the Fletcher-Suit system, is placed first, and the radioactive source is then transferred into the tandem remotely through the treatment machine. That shift from preloading to after-loading has improved safety for patients and staff.

Systemic chemotherapy is generally the upfront treatment for stage IVB cervical cancer, with radiotherapy used for symptom control rather than cure.

In patients with a large primary tumor or significant nodal burden, treatment may start with six weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before moving into concurrent chemoradiation, rather than proceeding straight to combined treatment.

This stepwise sequence exists to reduce toxicity. Operating on a bulky, locally advanced tumor without first confirming operability through imaging raises the risk of a positive surgical margin, which then commits the patient to more aggressive adjuvant treatment than a better-sequenced pathway would have required.