OncologyDr. Rajesh Kumar JainSurgical Oncology

Principal Director, Surgical Oncology, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi

Part 9 of 12 in Recent Trends in Surgical Oncology - Breast and GI Oncology

Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: Tumour Boards, Robotic Surgery and Patient Outcomes

September 6, 2026

Asked to explain, for a non-medical audience, what genuinely changes when treatment happens at a large, well-equipped cancer centre, Dr. Jain framed it around two goals that matter equally: more cures, and a good quality of life.

Where technology changes the experience of treatment

He used robotic surgery as an example: the same operation done as open surgery might mean roughly ten days of recovery, while a robotic approach can have a patient back to work in three or four days, with less pain and lower rates of bleeding and infection, even where the cure rate is comparable. He gave a second example from diagnostics: where next-generation gene sequencing is available, a lung adenocarcinoma patient can sometimes be managed with a single daily tablet, without radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, extending life by years.

The value of a tumour board

Dr. Jain described a third scenario, a pregnant patient with ovarian cancer, as the kind of complex case with no standard guideline that genuinely needs a multidisciplinary tumour board: an obstetrician, oncologist, onco-surgeon and the right imaging working together, rather than each specialist independently pushing their own preferred treatment. A well-resourced tumour board, pathologist, radiologist, surgical oncologist, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist and social worker all included, arrives at a genuinely joint decision for that specific patient. He also confirmed that BLK-Max welcomes doctors for training and observation, and that patients interested in travelling to India for treatment can be facilitated through Jivo.

This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Rajesh Kumar Jain, Principal Director, Surgical Oncology, BLK-Max Cancer Centre, New Delhi. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording

Looking for a surgical oncology consultation or a second opinion? Get in touch with the Jivo team

This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass: Dr. Rajesh Kumar Jain taught doctors across Africa on September 6, 2026.

FROM THE LIVE Q&A

MO

Moderator

To what extent can molecular analysis of pathological samples replace other treatment modalities like surgery, radiotherapy and immunohistochemistry?

RK

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Jain

Molecular investigation has a definite role in systemic treatment: where chemotherapy is used, molecular analysis can replace it with targeted therapy or immunotherapy in some cases. For localised cancer, surgery remains the mainstay and the most curative treatment, and cannot be replaced, though in advanced disease chemotherapy can be replaced by immunotherapy or targeted therapy. For radiation, adding radiosensitising drugs identified through molecular analysis can sometimes allow the radiation dose to be decreased. The larger goal should be prevention: a cervical cancer vaccine already exists, and a breast cancer vaccine within two to three years, with vaccines against most cancers within ten to fifteen years, would be the golden day of mankind.

See all 12 questions from this masterclass →

Book a Consultation with Dr. Rajesh Kumar Jain

Book on WhatsApp

Or message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669

Frequently Asked Questions

A question from Dr. Abubakar in Nigeria, joining partway through the session: what is circulating tumour DNA?

As a tumour breaks down, its cells release DNA that circulates in the blood. Finding this DNA in a blood sample can be used as a screening test, prompting further investigation like colonoscopy, CT scan or mammography to locate the source. Measured before and after treatment, for example after three months of chemotherapy, a drop to absent or minimal levels indicates a good response. Checked every six months for years after treatment, a previously absent reading reappearing can signal recurrence. It is not yet fully specific and is still being researched, but is expected to be used more heavily in screening, diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and recurrence detection.

The principle behind CAR-T cell therapy is using the body's own cells and modifying immunity to attack cancer. Could the body be developing cancers that our own immunity handles without it becoming a concern, with only cases beyond our immune capacity becoming a real concern for cancer doctors?

CAR-T cell therapy, and immunotherapy generally, works on a simple concept: our own immune cells are competent enough to fight infection and cancer, but whenever cancer is present, immunity goes down. Immunotherapy retrains the remaining immune cells to fight again, rather than killing the tumour directly. The drugs make our own immunity more competent, cells that were lying idle are retrained and made to recognise the cancer as the enemy, and then they go and fight it.

A question from Dr. Innocent Nzili in Kenya: why do some dormant cancer cells survive initial treatment and hide in the body for years before suddenly reactivating to cause a deadly recurrence?

The exact mechanism is still not fully known. But one clear factor is genetic aberrations that occur over time because of environmental exposure: if a patient achieves a cure but resumes alcohol or smoking, the damage caused by tobacco or other carcinogens affects the DNA again and dormant cells can get reactivated. That is one reason recurrence happens, though most of the time the actual mechanism is not known.

In sub-Saharan Africa, most countries do not have a PET-CT scanner. What alternatives can a doctor use to get a near-accurate estimation of disease stage without one?

For bone metastasis, use a nuclear bone scan; if that is unavailable, do a skeletal survey, plain X-rays of the spine, ribs, pelvis and limbs. For liver metastasis, a CT abdomen substitutes for PET, and an ultrasound is a fair investigation if CT is also unavailable. For the lungs, a CT chest is the alternative, and a plain chest X-ray is fair enough if CT is not available. Also check the uterus and ovaries with a pelvis ultrasound in every breast cancer patient, to rule out Krukenberg tumours. Ultrasound and X-rays are available almost everywhere in the world, and while less precise than PET-CT, this combination is enough to establish metastatic staging.

Many cancer cases referred from outside India are far advanced by the time they reach surgical oncology, with the objective becoming palliative rather than curative. How can doctors be made more aware of the need for timely referral?

Diagnosing cancer early, at stage 1 or 2, translates into cure; stage 4 offers very minimal chances of cure for any cancer. Where facilities and education are limited, the solution has three parts: awareness, awareness, and awareness, among doctors, the public and government. Over almost 30 years of practice, running thousands of community cancer-awareness camps across India, Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh with NGO partners has produced a real shift: around 1997, 75-80% of patients presented in stage 3 or 4; today in metropolitan India, around 60% present at an early stage.

Why does robotic surgery matter for patient outcomes?

It can shorten recovery from around ten days with open surgery to three or four days, with less pain and lower rates of bleeding and infection, while the cure rate remains comparable.

Why is a multidisciplinary tumour board important?

For complex cases with no standard guideline, a tumour board brings a pathologist, radiologist, surgical oncologist, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist and social worker together to reach a joint decision, rather than each specialist independently pushing their own preferred treatment.

Need Expert Medical Guidance?

Connect with leading specialists through the Jivo Healthcare network for personalized advice.

Get Expert Opinion