Knowing When Not to Operate: A Vascular Surgeon's Case for Restraint

Absolutely, yes — particularly if the D-dimer is done after the acute phase, in a subacute presentation of a few days. Despite the test's high sensitivity, the result can come back in the low hundreds, nowhere near diagnostic. DVT is an anatomical problem, and for an anatomical problem the answer is to see it directly on ultrasound, not infer it from a blood marker. Vascular ultrasound is learnable within three to four months, and we train nearly all our trainees to do it routinely.

Laser ablation for superficial spider veins or one or two perforators has an excellent prognosis, and works well up to the perforator level. But if the saphenofemoral junction itself is regurgitant, open surgery to ligate the SFJ and clip the draining tributaries is usually the better option rather than relying on endovascular ablation alone.

In a fragile patient, angioplasty is best avoided below the knee — it gives reasonable short-term results but nothing very promising long-term. If intervention is genuinely needed, it is more often approached surgically, favouring a reverse femoro-tibial bypass using the patient's own saphenous vein over a prosthetic graft, and favouring open surgery over an endovascular approach in this territory. Below the knee: use the simpler, older, better-proven option, and know when not to intervene at all.

It is a vascular disease, but the vascular problem is not what is causing the pain in this elderly lady — and if medicines can manage the condition, there is no need to intervene, even if that is commercially a loss rather than a win. There has been a silent shift from a doctor-patient relationship to a doctor-hospital relationship, where a patient's data no longer stays with the treating doctor once they change hospitals. Old-school medicine — operating only when needed, never when not needed — is what should endure through that change.

Never confuse varicose veins with cellulitis and simply give a course of antibiotics to send the patient away — that is the wrongest possible thing to do, and it is not a constructed scenario. This happens regularly in real-life GP clinics, and any swollen leg deserves at least a Doppler ultrasound before it is written off as a skin infection.

When the vascular finding is not actually the source of the patient's symptoms. One elderly patient reached 95% pain resolution after her postoperative phase without any vascular intervention at all, a reminder that a diagnosis on imaging does not automatically justify a procedure.

Angioplasty in this territory gives reasonable short-term results but poor long-term outcomes, particularly in fragile, elderly patients.

An open reverse femoro-tibial bypass using the patient's own saphenous vein, favoured over both a prosthetic graft and an endovascular approach.

The simpler, older, better-proven option should generally be favoured below the knee, and in the right patient, doing nothing at all can be the correct call even when another doctor has proposed intervention.