Senior Director - Urology, Andrology & Renal Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
Part 9 of 17 in Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
Why Prostate Cancer Affects African and Black Men More Severely
August 7, 2026
Prostate cancer has a strong racial and ethnic dependency, with black men experiencing both the highest incidence and the most aggressive form of the disease, well ahead of white, Hispanic and Asian populations. This pattern is a key reason prostate cancer was chosen as a specific focus for African patients considering prostate cancer treatment in India.
Which Populations Have the Highest Risk of Prostate Cancer?
Dr. Shafiq Ahmad explains that in the United States, prostate cancer incidence rates are highest among black men, followed by Hispanic and Latin populations, with the lowest rates seen in Asian and Pacific Islander populations. This disparity is not limited to how often prostate cancer occurs: when black men do develop prostate cancer, it tends to behave more aggressively than in Asian or Hispanic patients.
What Factors Explain This Racial Disparity?
The factors postulated to explain this disparity include genetic factors, environmental factors and socioeconomic factors, rather than any single cause. This combination of influences means African patients may need closer attention to prostate cancer screening and earlier evaluation than the general population.
What Does This Mean for African Patients Seeking Prostate Cancer Treatment in India?
Given the higher incidence and more aggressive behaviour of prostate cancer in African patients, earlier and more vigilant screening is particularly important for this population. Understanding this heightened risk is one of the reasons Dr. Shafiq Ahmad focused this masterclass specifically on prostate cancer for doctors treating African patients considering prostate cancer treatment in India.
← Prostate Cancer Overview: Age, Risk and Natural History | Series index | Prostate Cancer Screening and Survival: Why Country Matters →
This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Shafiq Ahmad, Senior Director, Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording
This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass — Dr. Shafiq Ahmad taught doctors across Africa on July 6, 2025.
FROM THE LIVE Q&A
Dr. Yigram
In a patient with total PSA greater than 10, a digital rectal exam that does not show nodularity, and no access to biopsy, what would be your recommendation for management options?
Dr. Shafiq Ahmad
False positivity of PSA is very common, so I would follow this patient regularly, first checking for infection. I would repeat the PSA after 6 weeks — if the high PSA was due to infection, a course of antibiotics should show a downward trend by then; if it doesn't trend down, you should have a high suspicion of prostate cancer. You can also check the free-to-total PSA ratio — if it's less than 25%, that supports the diagnosis. If the DRE is normal and there's no biopsy facility, you can follow the patient for a year and check PSA velocity — if it goes beyond 0.75 per year, refer to a centre with TRUS-guided biopsy or MRI facilities. With a PSA of 10-20, there is roughly a 10-30% chance of harbouring prostate cancer, so this should be investigated further rather than dismissed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the management of prostatic calcification in a 60-year-old man with no obstructive symptoms, PSA within normal limits at 2.8, and a prostate that is not enlarged?▼
This is a sign of chronic prostatitis — patients with chronic infection in the prostate get calcium deposited in the glandular secretions over time, which is the mechanism behind the calcification. If the patient is asymptomatic and PSA is normal, I would not worry. If symptomatic, try medical management first, and only if that fails should you consider a surgical procedure. Prostatic calcification itself does not cause any harm — it is simply a telltale sign of chronic infection in the prostate.
How effective is HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound) in early-stage prostate cancer?▼
In our country this facility is not widespread and is not yet widely accepted by the urology community here, though it is practised in the West by urologists, medical oncologists, and interventional radiologists. I would add that prostate cancer is usually slow-growing, but the prostate also has BPH growing alongside it, and patients with even locally advanced or oligometastatic disease often die from the obstructive mass effect of the prostate on the bladder neck and ureters rather than from the cancer itself — which is why, as a surgeon, I usually still consult even locally advanced or oligometastatic candidates for robotic radical prostatectomy, aiming for clear margins, early continence, and preserved erectile function.
What is the comparison between orchidectomy and radical prostatectomy?▼
There is no real comparison — they serve different purposes. Orchidectomy is chosen for metastatic (stage 4) disease, such as a patient with multiple spinal metastases who cannot walk. Radical prostatectomy is chosen for patients whose expected lifespan is more than 10 years, who are fit for surgery, and who have organ-confined, locally advanced, or oligometastatic disease (one or two spots on PSMA PET). Orchidectomy is simply a form of androgen deprivation — nowadays we hardly do it routinely because injectable or oral androgen deprivation therapy is available; it's now used mainly for stage 4 disease.
What are the ultrasound findings that differentiate chronic prostatitis from prostate cancer, and can tumour lysis syndrome occur at the initiation of radiotherapy?▼
On Doppler ultrasound, chronic prostatitis typically shows uniformly increased vascularity across the whole prostate, whereas prostate cancer shows increased vascularity at one specific point, such as a nodule. However, we don't rely on ultrasound alone to distinguish the two — it comes down to clinical judgement, PSA value, and age, since chronic prostatitis is a disease of younger, sexually active men in their 40s to early 50s, while prostate cancer is a disease of old age; I would be hesitant to diagnose chronic prostatitis in a 60-65 year old with a PSA of 10 and urinary symptoms — that points toward BPH with a suspicion of prostate cancer to rule out. On tumour lysis syndrome: yes, it can happen with any treatment — radiotherapy or chemotherapy — in any tumour, most often solid tumours; it is not specific to prostate cancer.
To reconfirm on orchidectomy — nowadays it's not done routinely for prostate cancer when androgen deprivation drugs are available, and it is done only where those drugs are not available — is that right?▼
Yes, that's correct. Orchidectomy is a cost-effective, one-time procedure, and increasingly patients in developing countries are also getting health insurance that covers the ongoing medications, so when it comes to overall treatment, orchidectomy can even be considered superior in efficacy compared to injectable treatment, and there's no harm in doing it. However, losing a testicle is a point of real psychological impact for a man, so if a patient can afford it or the treatment is available, I would suggest androgen deprivation therapy via injections or medication as preferable — orchidectomy remains a well-suited procedure specifically for patients with stage 4 disease.
Which population groups face the highest risk of prostate cancer?▼
In the United States, prostate cancer incidence rates are highest among black men, followed by Hispanic and Latin populations, with the lowest rates seen among Asian and Pacific Islander populations.
Does prostate cancer behave differently in black men than in other groups?▼
When black men develop prostate cancer, the disease tends to behave more aggressively than it does in Asian or Hispanic patients.
What factors explain the racial disparity in prostate cancer risk?▼
The disparity is explained by a combination of genetic, environmental and socioeconomic factors, rather than any single cause.
Why is earlier screening particularly important for African patients?▼
Given the higher incidence and more aggressive behaviour of prostate cancer in African patients, earlier and more vigilant screening is particularly important for this population.
In This Series: Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
- 1.Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
- 2.Side Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and How They Are Managed
- 3.Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Hormone Therapy and When Chemotherapy Is Needed
- 4.Orchidectomy Versus Radical Prostatectomy: What Is the Difference?
- 5.Prostate Biopsy and MRI Fusion Biopsy: How Prostate Cancer Is Confirmed
- 6.Why Prostate Cancer Patients Are Treated Surgically Even With Advanced Disease
- 7.Recovery After Prostate Cancer Surgery: Continence, Catheters and Follow-Up
- 8.Prostate Cancer Overview: Age, Risk and Natural History
- 9.Why Prostate Cancer Affects African and Black Men More Severely
- 10.Prostate Cancer Screening and Survival: Why Country Matters
- 11.Getting a Second Opinion for Prostate Cancer From India
- 12.Staging Prostate Cancer: MRI and PSMA PET CT Scans
- 13.Prostate Cancer Treatment by Stage: From Watchful Waiting to Surgery
- 14.PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer: What It Can and Cannot Tell You
- 15.PSA Velocity and the Free-to-Total PSA Ratio Explained
- 16.Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: How the Procedure Works
- 17.Robotic Versus Open Prostatectomy: Comparing the Outcomes