Senior Director - Urology, Andrology & Renal Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
Part 15 of 17 in Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
PSA Velocity and the Free-to-Total PSA Ratio Explained
August 7, 2026
PSA velocity and the free-to-total PSA ratio are two additional measures that help doctors distinguish true prostate cancer risk from a falsely elevated PSA, reducing unnecessary anxiety and unnecessary biopsies. These refinements are increasingly used alongside a single PSA value when evaluating men for prostate cancer in India.
What Is PSA Velocity and Why Does It Matter?
Dr. Shafiq Ahmad explains that PSA velocity, the rate of change in PSA over time, is considered significant when it rises by more than 0.75 nanograms per millilitre per year. A patient whose serial PSA readings show this rate of rise should be regarded with high suspicion for prostate cancer, even if any single reading looks only mildly elevated.
What Is the Free-to-Total PSA Ratio?
For patients whose PSA falls in the grey zone of roughly 2.5 to 10 nanograms per decilitre, checking the ratio of free to total PSA adds useful information: a ratio below 25 percent should prompt further evaluation for prostate cancer, since rapidly proliferating prostate tissue tends to secrete a lower proportion of free PSA.
How Are These Measures Used Together in Practice?
If a patient has a rising PSA velocity above 0.75 per year, or a free-to-total PSA ratio below 25 percent within the grey zone, further evaluation with imaging or biopsy is recommended rather than relying on a single PSA number in isolation. These combined measures give a more accurate picture of prostate cancer risk when planning next steps in prostate cancer diagnosis.
← PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer: What It Can and Cannot Tell You | Series index | Prostate Biopsy and MRI Fusion Biopsy: How Prostate Cancer Is Confirmed →
This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Shafiq Ahmad, Senior Director, Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording
This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass — Dr. Shafiq Ahmad taught doctors across Africa on July 6, 2025.
FROM THE LIVE Q&A
A general surgeon working in a district general hospital
I have a patient with bilateral paraparesis, power of the lower limbs 2/5 bilaterally, a hard prostate on digital rectal exam, and PSA greater than 100 — advanced prostate cancer with spinal metastasis causing the paraparesis was considered. In our setup we don't have hormonal therapy, so we did a bilateral orchidectomy, and the patient improved and was able to walk within five days. On follow-up he developed excessive heat, central abdominal obesity, breast enlargement, and high TSH. How should this hormonal disturbance be managed?
Dr. Shafiq Ahmad
What you're describing is the androgen depletion syndrome — you have abolished testosterone, so the patient develops post-menopausal-type symptoms. In our practice, for patients who have undergone androgen deprivation, we educate them not to panic, start gabapentin and sometimes an anti-anxiety medication, and for central obesity and related issues advise calcium and vitamin D supplements, a high-protein, low-fat diet, regular exercise, and sunlight exposure, since bones become fragile and there is increased risk of coronary artery disease and hypertension. We sometimes also use denosumab if the patient is very incapacitated by hot flashes and sweating. You did the right thing for your patient — surgical castration is the most practical option where injectable androgen analogues or antagonists aren't reliably available.
Frequently Asked Questions
In a patient with total PSA greater than 10, a digital rectal exam that does not show nodularity, and no access to biopsy, what would be your recommendation for management options?▼
False positivity of PSA is very common, so I would follow this patient regularly, first checking for infection. I would repeat the PSA after 6 weeks — if the high PSA was due to infection, a course of antibiotics should show a downward trend by then; if it doesn't trend down, you should have a high suspicion of prostate cancer. You can also check the free-to-total PSA ratio — if it's less than 25%, that supports the diagnosis. If the DRE is normal and there's no biopsy facility, you can follow the patient for a year and check PSA velocity — if it goes beyond 0.75 per year, refer to a centre with TRUS-guided biopsy or MRI facilities. With a PSA of 10-20, there is roughly a 10-30% chance of harbouring prostate cancer, so this should be investigated further rather than dismissed.
What is the management of prostatic calcification in a 60-year-old man with no obstructive symptoms, PSA within normal limits at 2.8, and a prostate that is not enlarged?▼
This is a sign of chronic prostatitis — patients with chronic infection in the prostate get calcium deposited in the glandular secretions over time, which is the mechanism behind the calcification. If the patient is asymptomatic and PSA is normal, I would not worry. If symptomatic, try medical management first, and only if that fails should you consider a surgical procedure. Prostatic calcification itself does not cause any harm — it is simply a telltale sign of chronic infection in the prostate.
How effective is HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound) in early-stage prostate cancer?▼
In our country this facility is not widespread and is not yet widely accepted by the urology community here, though it is practised in the West by urologists, medical oncologists, and interventional radiologists. I would add that prostate cancer is usually slow-growing, but the prostate also has BPH growing alongside it, and patients with even locally advanced or oligometastatic disease often die from the obstructive mass effect of the prostate on the bladder neck and ureters rather than from the cancer itself — which is why, as a surgeon, I usually still consult even locally advanced or oligometastatic candidates for robotic radical prostatectomy, aiming for clear margins, early continence, and preserved erectile function.
What is the comparison between orchidectomy and radical prostatectomy?▼
There is no real comparison — they serve different purposes. Orchidectomy is chosen for metastatic (stage 4) disease, such as a patient with multiple spinal metastases who cannot walk. Radical prostatectomy is chosen for patients whose expected lifespan is more than 10 years, who are fit for surgery, and who have organ-confined, locally advanced, or oligometastatic disease (one or two spots on PSMA PET). Orchidectomy is simply a form of androgen deprivation — nowadays we hardly do it routinely because injectable or oral androgen deprivation therapy is available; it's now used mainly for stage 4 disease.
What are the ultrasound findings that differentiate chronic prostatitis from prostate cancer, and can tumour lysis syndrome occur at the initiation of radiotherapy?▼
On Doppler ultrasound, chronic prostatitis typically shows uniformly increased vascularity across the whole prostate, whereas prostate cancer shows increased vascularity at one specific point, such as a nodule. However, we don't rely on ultrasound alone to distinguish the two — it comes down to clinical judgement, PSA value, and age, since chronic prostatitis is a disease of younger, sexually active men in their 40s to early 50s, while prostate cancer is a disease of old age; I would be hesitant to diagnose chronic prostatitis in a 60-65 year old with a PSA of 10 and urinary symptoms — that points toward BPH with a suspicion of prostate cancer to rule out. On tumour lysis syndrome: yes, it can happen with any treatment — radiotherapy or chemotherapy — in any tumour, most often solid tumours; it is not specific to prostate cancer.
What is PSA velocity and why does it matter?▼
PSA velocity, the rate of change in PSA over time, is considered significant when it rises by more than 0.75 nanograms per millilitre per year, and should be regarded with high suspicion even if any single reading looks only mildly elevated.
What is the free-to-total PSA ratio used for?▼
For patients whose PSA falls in the grey zone of roughly 2.5 to 10 nanograms per decilitre, a free-to-total PSA ratio below 25 percent should prompt further evaluation for prostate cancer.
Why does a low free PSA ratio suggest higher cancer risk?▼
Rapidly proliferating prostate tissue tends to secrete a lower proportion of free PSA, which is why a low free-to-total ratio adds useful information beyond a single PSA value.
How are PSA velocity and the free-to-total ratio used together in practice?▼
If a patient has a rising PSA velocity above 0.75 per year, or a free-to-total ratio below 25 percent within the grey zone, further evaluation with imaging or biopsy is recommended rather than relying on a single PSA number in isolation.
In This Series: Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
- 1.Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
- 2.Side Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and How They Are Managed
- 3.Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Hormone Therapy and When Chemotherapy Is Needed
- 4.Orchidectomy Versus Radical Prostatectomy: What Is the Difference?
- 5.Prostate Biopsy and MRI Fusion Biopsy: How Prostate Cancer Is Confirmed
- 6.Why Prostate Cancer Patients Are Treated Surgically Even With Advanced Disease
- 7.Recovery After Prostate Cancer Surgery: Continence, Catheters and Follow-Up
- 8.Prostate Cancer Overview: Age, Risk and Natural History
- 9.Why Prostate Cancer Affects African and Black Men More Severely
- 10.Prostate Cancer Screening and Survival: Why Country Matters
- 11.Getting a Second Opinion for Prostate Cancer From India
- 12.Staging Prostate Cancer: MRI and PSMA PET CT Scans
- 13.Prostate Cancer Treatment by Stage: From Watchful Waiting to Surgery
- 14.PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer: What It Can and Cannot Tell You
- 15.PSA Velocity and the Free-to-Total PSA Ratio Explained
- 16.Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: How the Procedure Works
- 17.Robotic Versus Open Prostatectomy: Comparing the Outcomes