ENTDr. Dilpreet BajwaCochlear Implants

Senior Consultant, ENT Surgery, Artemis Hospitals, Gurgaon, India

Part 4 of 11 in Cochlear Implants in Children: From Candidacy to Classroom Success

The 1-3-6 Rule: Building a Newborn Hearing Screening Program

March 1, 2026

Universal newborn hearing screening is routine in developed health systems but, as Dr. Bajwa points out, still absent from many government hospitals in India. Left unscreened, a child with hearing loss is often not diagnosed until age two, by which point much of the window during which the brain is most receptive to language has already closed.

The rule

Dr. Bajwa organizes early intervention around what she calls the 1-3-6 rule: screen for hearing loss by one month of age, confirm a diagnosis by three months, and begin intervention by six months. Each step is a deadline, not a suggestion, because the value of early detection decays with every month it is delayed.

The frontline test

Otoacoustic emissions testing, OAE, is the primary screening tool. It is non-invasive, painless, portable and takes under a minute: a healthy cochlea's inner hair cells emit sound waves back to the testing device, and their absence is the signal that something needs a closer look. When OAE results are abnormal, the next step is a full diagnostic battery, including auditory brainstem response testing, ASSR, and behavioral or visual response audiometry.

Where universal screening is not yet available

In settings where every newborn cannot be screened, Dr. Bajwa's practical guidance is to prioritize high-risk infants: those with a NICU stay, neonatal jaundice, meningitis, maternal CMV infection, a family history of hearing loss, prematurity, seizures, exposure to ototoxic drugs, or a syndromic appearance. Targeting this group captures a disproportionate share of cases even where a universal program is not yet feasible.

This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass — Dr. Dilpreet Bajwa taught doctors across Africa on March 1, 2026.

FROM THE LIVE Q&A

DR

Dr. Maura Martin

Apart from children, what are the treatment options for adults who develop hearing problems later in life?

DB

Dr. Dilpreet Bajwa

The first option is always a hearing aid. If it provides adequate, meaningful hearing, meaning the person can discriminate between words rather than just hear noise, that remains the treatment. Presbycusis, age-related hearing loss common in people 80 to 85 years old with no prior history, is a typical cause. If hearing aids only deliver noise without clarity, a cochlear implant is an option at any age.

See all 8 questions from this masterclass →

Book a Consultation with Dr. Dilpreet Bajwa

Book on WhatsApp

Or message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669

Frequently Asked Questions

Will it be useful for adults with hearing loss due to cancer such as chronic myeloid leukemia?

Absolutely. Chronic myeloid leukemia and even chronic kidney disease are not contraindications, because CML is an indolent, slow-moving disease. As long as the patient is medically stable and vaccinated beforehand, implantation can significantly improve their social interaction and quality of life.

For international patients, for example from an African country, how is long-term follow-up and device calibration handled if there is a local shortage of professionals?

Programming is now available online because most modern devices have built-in Bluetooth. An audiologist can connect through an app on a laptop or phone and wirelessly program or calibrate the device remotely, in much the same way as this Zoom masterclass, without the patient needing to travel back.

Regarding affordability, what does the surgery and device cost, and is it covered by insurance?

In India, cochlear implants are not covered by insurance, and the device is expensive, so CSR funds and government programs are used to support Indian families. Nothing equivalent currently exists for international patients. Paid out of pocket, surgery including the device starts at around 14,000 US dollars and can go up to 36,000 US dollars for high-end models, with cost driven mainly by MRI-compatible magnet strength, auto-programming that adjusts to noise every few seconds, and built-in Bluetooth.

If technology keeps changing, does the internal implant become a limiting factor over time?

No. Implant companies design the internal device to stay compatible even as external technology advances. The first person implanted with a cochlear device, in 1984, is still using that original internal component 42 years later, having only upgraded the external processor along the way.

What is the lifespan of the cochlear implant? Does it need to be replaced at any stage?

The internal device is designed to last a lifetime and does not normally require replacement, barring a major accident. The external processor is upgradeable and generally lasts 5 to 7 years, and patients tend to upgrade whenever a company introduces new technology, such as AI-based features.

What is the 1-3-6 rule for newborn hearing screening?

Screen for hearing loss by one month of age, confirm a diagnosis by three months, and begin intervention by six months. Each step is a deadline rather than a suggestion, since the value of early detection decays with every month it is delayed.

What happens when a child is not screened for hearing loss at birth?

Left unscreened, a child with hearing loss is often not diagnosed until age two, by which point much of the window during which the brain is most receptive to language has already closed.

What is OAE testing and why is it used for newborns?

Otoacoustic emissions testing is the primary screening tool. It is non-invasive, painless, portable and takes under a minute: a healthy cochlea's inner hair cells emit sound waves back to the testing device, and their absence is the signal that something needs a closer look.

What happens after an abnormal OAE result?

The next step is a full diagnostic battery, including auditory brainstem response testing, ASSR, and behavioral or visual response audiometry.

Which infants should be prioritized for screening where universal testing is not yet available?

High-risk infants, including those with a NICU stay, neonatal jaundice, meningitis, maternal CMV infection, a family history of hearing loss, prematurity, seizures, exposure to ototoxic drugs, or a syndromic appearance. Targeting this group captures a disproportionate share of cases even where a universal program is not yet feasible.

Need Expert Medical Guidance?

Connect with leading specialists through the Jivo Healthcare network for personalized advice.

Get Expert Opinion