NeurosurgeryDr. Anil Kumar KansalSpine & Neurosurgery

Vice Chairman and HOD, Neuro Surgery and Neuro Spine, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India

Part 2 of 8 in Recent Advances in Spine and Neurosurgery

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Percutaneous Discectomy, Kyphoplasty and Disc Replacement

May 31, 2026

Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy suits contained disc herniations (where the disc bulges and compresses the nerve root but hasn't fully extruded into the spinal canal), removed through a minimal incision with the nerve root protected throughout. Kyphoplasty treats osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, typically after trivial trauma in elderly patients who cannot tolerate the old standard of 2 to 3 months of absolute bed rest: bone cement injected percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance gives more than 90% of patients significant pain relief by the next day, with mobilisation starting immediately after. It is absolutely contraindicated with active infection at the fracture site or a retropulsed bone fragment compressing the canal, where cement leak risks paraplegia.

Cervical disc replacement addresses a real limitation of the conventional ACDF fusion surgery: fusing a diseased segment (commonly C5-6) eliminates motion there and pushes stress onto the segments above and below, risking adjacent segment disease over time. Disc replacement removes the diseased disc and inserts a prosthesis instead, preserving motion at the treated level (confirmed intraoperatively as the disc space visibly opens and closes with flexion and extension), which significantly reduces adjacent segment disease risk and shortens or eliminates the need for a postoperative collar.

This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass — Dr. Anil Kumar Kansal taught doctors across Africa on May 31, 2026.

FROM THE LIVE Q&A

DR

Dr. Abdullah (Arabic-speaking patient facilitator)

What are the long-term drawbacks of DBS — what happens after 10 or 15 years?

AK

Dr. Anil Kumar Kansal

The main issues over time are battery depletion (non-rechargeable batteries need changing every 5 to 7 years, rechargeable systems last around 15 years), electrode disconnection or failure from trauma or mechanical wear, and the need for settings adjustments as the disease progresses. Patients need periodic visits for reprogramming, though newer devices allow remote setting changes via mobile. Battery change is the most common long-term issue.

See all 9 questions from this masterclass →

Book a Consultation with Dr. Anil Kumar Kansal

Book on WhatsApp

Or message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669

Frequently Asked Questions

When does DBS come in the sequence of Parkinson's treatment, and what does it cost?

We always start with medication at a lower dose, increasing gradually to control symptoms. The ideal time to move to DBS is around 4 to 5 years after diagnosis, when the required dose is becoming too high, side effects are a problem, or the medication effect is fading — DBS at that stage can abolish or significantly reduce the drug requirement and restore quality of life. At our hospital, the total package including surgery, anaesthesia, device, medicines, testing and hospital stay runs approximately USD 30,000 to 35,000, with the variation depending on rechargeable versus non-rechargeable devices.

There is a lot of public fear around spine and brain surgery. Can you share the actual complication rates so we can counsel patients accurately?

For spine surgery, major complications run around 2%, life-threatening complications around 0.5%, and neurological deficit around 1 to 1.5% — 98% of patients do well, 90% do very well, at a centre doing 400 to 500 spine surgeries a year. Patients should understand that surgery corrects the structural problem but can't always undo pre-existing nerve damage, so some residual tingling or numbness may persist even in a good outcome. For brain surgery, mortality is around 1 to 2% and total risk of neurological deficit is 5 to 7% at expert centres, with 93% of patients doing very well after tumour removal — the main caveat is that malignant tumours can recur despite surgery, since resection alone isn't curative and radiotherapy and chemotherapy are also required.

How close are we to restoring function in patients with complete spinal cord injuries?

Complete spinal cord injuries will not result in complete neurological recovery, and some patients recover only minimally. What we can address is the secondary symptoms: pain and spasticity, managed with baclofen or morphine pumps, and dorsal cord stimulators, which can improve sensation and reduce spasticity, with some incomplete-injury patients regaining a degree of leg power combined with physiotherapy. If hand function is preserved, we train patients to manage daily life with their upper limbs and a wheelchair. But for complete injuries specifically, meaningful motor recovery is not something we can promise.

What is the role of stem cells in spinal cord injury management?

I conducted a study on this myself — we took stem cells from the iliac bone and implanted them at the injury site in around 20 patients. One patient showed some improvement, but it couldn't be separated from natural recovery under medication, and statistically we found no significant benefit. We discontinued the trial. Stem cell therapy for complete spinal cord injury is still not recommended anywhere in the world; for partial injuries there may be some benefit, but meaningful recovery from stem cells in complete injuries has not been demonstrated.

What are the current limitations of awake craniotomy and how are they being addressed?

Awake craniotomy, used for tumours near the motor cortex or speech areas, requires full patient cooperation throughout — some patients become agitated under partial sedation and we've had to convert to general anaesthesia. For international patients, a translator has to be present in the operating room the entire time, which adds another layer of difficulty. Personally I'm not very keen on it given how demanding it is for the patient; we now prefer using preoperative functional MRI to map eloquent areas and then operate under general anaesthesia while avoiding those mapped regions, which reduces the need for awake craniotomy in many cases.

Which disc herniations are best suited for percutaneous endoscopic discectomy?

Contained disc herniations, where the disc bulges and compresses the nerve root but has not fully extruded into the spinal canal, respond well to this minimally invasive approach.

How quickly do patients feel pain relief after kyphoplasty?

More than 90% of patients report significant pain relief by the next day, with mobilisation starting immediately after.

When is kyphoplasty contraindicated?

It is contraindicated with active infection at the fracture site, and with a retropulsed bone fragment compressing the spinal canal, where cement leak carries a risk of paraplegia.

How does cervical disc replacement differ from ACDF fusion surgery?

ACDF fuses the diseased segment, which eliminates motion there and pushes stress onto the segments above and below, raising the risk of adjacent segment disease. Disc replacement removes the diseased disc and inserts a prosthesis that preserves motion at the treated level, reducing that risk and shortening or eliminating the need for a postoperative collar.

How is motion preservation confirmed during cervical disc replacement surgery?

It is confirmed intraoperatively, as the disc space is visibly seen to open and close with flexion and extension.

Need Expert Medical Guidance?

Connect with leading specialists through the Jivo Healthcare network for personalized advice.

Get Expert Opinion