Robotic Hysterectomy: When It Is Used and What Recovery Looks Like

Robotic surgery is a little more expensive than laparoscopic surgery — depending on the type of surgery, somewhere around $1,000 to $1,200 extra than any conventional laparoscopic surgery.

It depends on the age of the patient and her fertility desire. If it's a perimenopausal woman around 48 who has completed her family and has multiple fibroids, it's her choice whether she wants just the fibroids removed or the uterus removed too — sometimes women have very tiny peanut-sized fibroids we cannot take out at the time, and those can recur and regrow. So in many such women it's often better to think about getting the uterus removed rather than saving it. These are the kinds of discussions I'd have with the patient, taking them through the pros and cons of either, and then they can make a call.

People who train in robotic surgery are mostly already laparoscopic surgeons who've done many laparoscopic surgeries — very few robotic surgeons are 'de novo,' never having done laparoscopic surgery. If you've driven a manual car and now you're going to an automatic, proficiency comes sooner — you just need to learn to drive the robot. On conversion: I had one case in the last three to four years where I had to open a patient up, purely because during robotic surgery the patient's head is at a 30-degree angle, quite low down, and there was a lung compromise issue — the patient wasn't able to maintain oxygen saturation. We tried undocking the robot and raising her head, waited ten minutes and restarted, but her saturation kept dropping, so we had to open her up. That's the only case I can recall in three years, out of several hundred surgeries — patient selection is the most important thing.

With God's grace, none of my patients have ended up in the ICU or anything like that — they've all recovered beautifully. I've done more than 400 to 500 robotic surgeries so far, and I cannot recall any complications in terms of injury to the bladder, bowel, or ureter — essentially a 100% success rate at the post-operative stage.

It depends what's meant by 'failure rate' — conversion to open surgery, complications, or the surgery not being viable at all. On not being viable: if you're an expert in robotic surgery, you should be able to make that decision pre-operatively through proper planning — getting an MRI or CT done if the ultrasound report isn't satisfactory. On complications: the risk of injury is less than 1% with robotic surgery — for bowel and vessel injury specifically the risk is less than 0.5%, and bladder injury is similarly low, compared with 1 to 2% with laparoscopic surgery.

Robotic hysterectomy is used to remove the uterus in conditions such as large fibroids, post-menopausal bleeding or early endometrial cancer, typically with almost bloodless dissection and a hospital stay of only one to two days.

Because of the precision robotic instruments allow, robotic hysterectomy can sometimes take less time than the same procedure performed laparoscopically, meaning the patient spends less time under anaesthesia.

Yes. In one case, a patient with a 10 cm uterine fibroid who had been told she was not a candidate for laparoscopic surgery was instead treated with robotic hysterectomy, and was discharged after one day with no need for a blood transfusion.

The clarity of the robotic 3D vision allows surgeons to separate tissue planes without damaging surrounding fatty tissue, keeping dissection almost completely blood free even in cases such as post-menopausal bleeding with a thickened endometrium.