Who Benefits Most from Robotic Gynaecological Surgery?

It depends on the age of the patient and her fertility desire. If it's a perimenopausal woman around 48 who has completed her family and has multiple fibroids, it's her choice whether she wants just the fibroids removed or the uterus removed too — sometimes women have very tiny peanut-sized fibroids we cannot take out at the time, and those can recur and regrow. So in many such women it's often better to think about getting the uterus removed rather than saving it. These are the kinds of discussions I'd have with the patient, taking them through the pros and cons of either, and then they can make a call.

People who train in robotic surgery are mostly already laparoscopic surgeons who've done many laparoscopic surgeries — very few robotic surgeons are 'de novo,' never having done laparoscopic surgery. If you've driven a manual car and now you're going to an automatic, proficiency comes sooner — you just need to learn to drive the robot. On conversion: I had one case in the last three to four years where I had to open a patient up, purely because during robotic surgery the patient's head is at a 30-degree angle, quite low down, and there was a lung compromise issue — the patient wasn't able to maintain oxygen saturation. We tried undocking the robot and raising her head, waited ten minutes and restarted, but her saturation kept dropping, so we had to open her up. That's the only case I can recall in three years, out of several hundred surgeries — patient selection is the most important thing.

With God's grace, none of my patients have ended up in the ICU or anything like that — they've all recovered beautifully. I've done more than 400 to 500 robotic surgeries so far, and I cannot recall any complications in terms of injury to the bladder, bowel, or ureter — essentially a 100% success rate at the post-operative stage.

It depends what's meant by 'failure rate' — conversion to open surgery, complications, or the surgery not being viable at all. On not being viable: if you're an expert in robotic surgery, you should be able to make that decision pre-operatively through proper planning — getting an MRI or CT done if the ultrasound report isn't satisfactory. On complications: the risk of injury is less than 1% with robotic surgery — for bowel and vessel injury specifically the risk is less than 0.5%, and bladder injury is similarly low, compared with 1 to 2% with laparoscopic surgery.

Artemis has been very proactive with all sorts of expansion, and is very much into the international world — we're there to support it. With the new digital world, things like today's Zoom session can happen, and I'll be very happy to be part of any travel needed, taking time out every couple of months to be with the doctors and patients there. I'm a very proactive person when it comes to teaching and training, because the skills we've acquired are good to spread around so more people can gain the expertise.

Patients with severe endometriosis, multiple uterine fibroids, or a high body mass index above 30 tend to benefit most from robotic gynaecological surgery.

In severe endometriosis, there can be significant adhesions between the bowel, the uterus and the ovaries. Because robotic surgery offers around 15 times more precision than laparoscopy, it is particularly well suited to carefully separating these adhesions and reducing the risk of injury to surrounding organs.

Women with a high BMI, generally above 30, benefit from robotic surgery because it requires less anaesthesia time and generally produces better outcomes than open or laparoscopic surgery, given its more precise, less invasive approach.