Senior Director, Urology, Uro-Oncology, Andrology and Kidney Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi
Part 7 of 10 in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Redefining Precision in Prostate Cancer Surgery
Focal Therapy (HIFU) vs Robotic Surgery vs Open Surgery
September 13, 2026
Two comparisons come up often when counselling patients on their surgical options: focal therapy versus robotic surgery, and robotic versus open surgery.
Focal therapy (HIFU) has a narrow role
Prostate cancer is usually multifocal, so focal therapies such as HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound) suit only a small subset of patients, around 2 to 5% of the whole pool, where a complete systematic biopsy confirms one localised, well-circumscribed nodule with the rest of the gland genuinely free of tumour. Robotic surgery remains the treatment of choice for most patients, with a time-proven cure rate of roughly 95%, since a new nodule can appear elsewhere after focal therapy, and prior radiotherapy or focal treatment makes any later robotic surgery more difficult and reduces the chance of preserving nerves and sexual function.
Open surgery is becoming obsolete
Open prostate surgery today has almost no role. Robotic assistance achieves better surgical margins even in locally advanced disease, along with better preservation of sexual function, because the neurovascular bundles are more easily identified, the dissection is more precise, and the magnification is far better; hydrodissection of the neurovascular tissue is sometimes used to help preserve the plane. The real clinical question in locally advanced disease is whether surgery of any kind is appropriate at all, not which surgical technique to choose.
This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Y P S Rana, Director, Urology, Uro-Oncology, Andrology and Kidney Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording
Looking for a urology or kidney transplant consultation? Get in touch with the Jivo team
This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass: Dr. Yajvender Pratap Singh Rana taught doctors across Africa on September 13, 2026.
FROM THE LIVE Q&A
Dr. Feyera Abetu (Ethiopia)
In Ethiopia, prostate disease is mainly managed with orchidectomy rather than radical prostatectomy, diagnosed by PSA alone without routine biopsy or metastatic work-up, since robotic surgery and pelvic exposure aren't available - how should localised cases be approached in that setting?
Dr. Yajvender Pratap Singh Rana
Orchidectomy should not be the answer for localised prostate cancer, it causes more harm than benefit, leaves the patient without erections, and the disease may still, over time, develop bone or other metastasis. Since MRI is available in Ethiopia even without bone or PET scans, an MRI of the lumbar spine and pelvis can screen for bony metastasis; orchidectomy is justified only if metastasis is found. Otherwise, patients with early-stage disease should be told clearly that the correct treatment, excision of the diseased organ rather than the testes, isn't currently available locally, and encouraged to pursue it overseas, including with help arranging financial support and other resources.
Book a Consultation with Dr. Yajvender Pratap Singh Rana
Book on WhatsAppOr message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669
Frequently Asked Questions
A 45-year-old woman presented with haematuria and right flank pain, found to have a renal mass (likely renal cell carcinoma) with liver and lung metastases and a thrombus extending from the renal vein into the IVC. Since renal cell carcinoma is chemo-resistant, how should this be managed?▼
Ideally a kidney biopsy would first establish the histological subtype (clear cell, chromophobe, papillary, or another type) to guide systemic treatment, immunotherapies such as nivolumab, or TKIs such as sunitinib or pazopanib if immunotherapy isn't available. These agents are distinct from chemotherapy, and immunotherapy is increasingly recommended in guidelines for advanced and metastatic disease. This particular patient, with liver metastases, is not a surgical candidate, and a realistic prognosis should be given. Nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy is appropriate when disease is still localised or locally advanced, since a kidney tumour extending through the IVC is still considered as such, but once there are multiple metastases in the liver and elsewhere, surgery is not the right approach.
What are the best currently available anti-cancer therapies in India for advanced prostate cancer, and what role do targeted gene therapy and immunotherapy play?▼
The backbone remains continuous ADT, agents like degarelix or leuprolide, combined with newer anti-androgens such as abiraterone or enzalutamide, known as ARPIs (androgen receptor pathway inhibitors), plus genetic testing, where a BRCA mutation supports adding a PARP inhibitor such as olaparib, with many patients now on doublet, triplet or even quadruplet combinations rather than ADT alone. Oligometastatic (limited stage 4) disease confined mainly to the prostate and pelvis can still be surgically debulked alongside roughly one to one-and-a-half years of ADT; widespread stage 4 disease has no surgical indication. When these lines of treatment fail, options include immunotherapy, docetaxel- or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, and lutetium (PSMA) radioligand therapy, which tags rapidly-dividing, PSMA-expressing tumour cells for targeted internal radiotherapy, plus other immunotherapies such as pembrolizumab. Targeted gene therapy itself isn't yet in commercial clinical use, what is used is genetic testing to select the most effective molecule for a given patient's mutation profile, such as PARP inhibitors for BRCA2-positive cancer.
How should counselling be framed for patients with very advanced prostate cancer?▼
The patient needs a realistic sense of hope appropriate to their stage. A PSA above 1000 indicates metastatic disease, and in that setting the approach shifts from surgical cure to bringing the cancer under control with ADT and other systemic molecules.
How does training for robotic radical prostatectomy work, and is prostatectomy for benign prostate disease also done transurethrally with the robot?▼
Transurethral procedures such as bipolar enucleation, bipolar resection, TURP, or HoLEP are all for benign prostate enlargement. Radical prostatectomy is a different operation for cancer of the prostate, done robotically. There is also a robotic option for very large benign glands: whenever the prostate is bigger than 200 to 250 grams, a robotic simple prostatectomy is performed instead of a transurethral procedure.
Most patients' biggest concern before agreeing to prostatectomy is how well and how quickly they will return to normal erectile function - how should that be addressed?▼
Outcomes vary by patient. In one case, a patient in his early sixties found to have a Gleason 4+4 tumour during routine follow-up for an unrelated condition could not be kept on active surveillance despite being young and sexually active. Given a realistic estimate of about an 80% chance of good erections afterward, he was started on tadalafil to prime the tissue before robotic surgery; within about four weeks of catheter removal he reported a full return of intimacy with his wife. Preservation depends on how sexually active and physically strong the patient was beforehand and on the tumour stage: early-stage tumours allow both neurovascular bundles to be spared, with tadalafil and, if needed, self-stimulation techniques or intracavernosal injections used during rehabilitation; in advanced cases where nerves cannot be spared, a penile implant remains an option. Cancer cure always comes first, since the patient must survive before sexual function can be addressed.
Who is a good candidate for focal therapy like HIFU?▼
Only a small subset of patients, about 2 to 5%, where a complete systematic biopsy confirms one well-circumscribed nodule and the rest of the prostate is genuinely free of tumour.
Is robotic surgery better than open surgery for prostate cancer?▼
Yes - robotic surgery achieves better margins and better preservation of sexual function, since the neurovascular bundles are more easily identified with better precision and magnification.
In This Series: Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Redefining Precision in Prostate Cancer Surgery
- 1.Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
- 2.Early Warning Signs and Diagnostic Work-Up in Uro-Oncology
- 3.Managing Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer with Neoadjuvant ADT
- 4.Treatment Options for Localised and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
- 5.Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Step-by-Step Surgical Technique
- 6.Erectile Function Recovery After Robotic Prostatectomy
- 7.Focal Therapy (HIFU) vs Robotic Surgery vs Open Surgery
- 8.Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Kidney Tumours
- 9.Managing Prostate and Kidney Cancer Without Access to Robotic Surgery
- 10.Systemic and Targeted Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer