UrologyDr. Yajvender Pratap Singh RanaRobotic Prostatectomy

Senior Director, Urology, Uro-Oncology, Andrology and Kidney Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi

Part 5 of 10 in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Redefining Precision in Prostate Cancer Surgery

Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Step-by-Step Surgical Technique

September 13, 2026

Robotic radical prostatectomy follows a defined sequence of steps, each aided by the precision and magnification the robot provides.

Posterior and anterior dissection

The procedure begins with posterior dissection: the vas deferens on both sides and the seminal vesicles are dissected and divided. Anterior dissection follows, incising the peritoneal flap, dropping the bladder, and entering the anterior plane. The endopelvic fascia is then opened and dissected down to the level of the urethra and the dorsal venous complex (DVC), which is secured with a stitch, a step made considerably easier by robotic assistance than by conventional laparoscopy at this deep angle.

Anastomosis, leak test and lymph node dissection

The prostatovesical junction is divided in a bloodless plane, the bladder is freed from the prostate until the urethra is opened, and the catheter is delivered out. Once the prostate specimen is removed, the urethra is stitched to the bladder in a bladder-neck-preserving urethrovesical anastomosis, and a leak test with saline confirms a watertight closure before the catheter is planned for removal after 7 to 10 days. Lymph node dissection follows along the external and internal iliac arteries and the obturator fossa; in locally advanced cases, an extended lymph node dissection is performed.

This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Y P S Rana, Director, Urology, Uro-Oncology, Andrology and Kidney Transplant, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording

Looking for a urology or kidney transplant consultation? Get in touch with the Jivo team

This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass: Dr. Yajvender Pratap Singh Rana taught doctors across Africa on September 13, 2026.

FROM THE LIVE Q&A

DR

Dr. William Gadaga (Zimbabwe)

Is there evidence of better nerve sparing with robotic surgery compared with open surgery, particularly in locally advanced disease?

YP

Dr. Yajvender Pratap Singh Rana

Open prostate surgery today has almost no role. Robotic surgery achieves better surgical margins even in locally advanced disease. Having practised through the open, laparoscopic and now exclusively robotic eras, and never having converted a robotic case to open surgery, the real question in locally advanced disease is whether surgery is appropriate at all, not which technique to use. If disease is essentially metastatic, surgery offers no benefit and should not be done, but there is no patient suitable for robotic surgery who would somehow do better with an open approach instead.

See all 10 questions from this masterclass →

Book a Consultation with Dr. Yajvender Pratap Singh Rana

Book on WhatsApp

Or message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669

Frequently Asked Questions

Is robotic radical prostatectomy safer than open surgery specifically from the perspective of preserving erectile function?

Yes, robotic surgery preserves sexual function better than laparoscopic or open surgery, because the neurovascular bundles are more easily identified, the dissection is more precise, and the magnification is far better; hydrodissection of the neurovascular tissue is sometimes used to help preserve the plane. Robotic surgery scores over other options on preservation of sexual function.

In Ethiopia, prostate disease is mainly managed with orchidectomy rather than radical prostatectomy, diagnosed by PSA alone without routine biopsy or metastatic work-up, since robotic surgery and pelvic exposure aren't available - how should localised cases be approached in that setting?

Orchidectomy should not be the answer for localised prostate cancer, it causes more harm than benefit, leaves the patient without erections, and the disease may still, over time, develop bone or other metastasis. Since MRI is available in Ethiopia even without bone or PET scans, an MRI of the lumbar spine and pelvis can screen for bony metastasis; orchidectomy is justified only if metastasis is found. Otherwise, patients with early-stage disease should be told clearly that the correct treatment, excision of the diseased organ rather than the testes, isn't currently available locally, and encouraged to pursue it overseas, including with help arranging financial support and other resources.

A 45-year-old woman presented with haematuria and right flank pain, found to have a renal mass (likely renal cell carcinoma) with liver and lung metastases and a thrombus extending from the renal vein into the IVC. Since renal cell carcinoma is chemo-resistant, how should this be managed?

Ideally a kidney biopsy would first establish the histological subtype (clear cell, chromophobe, papillary, or another type) to guide systemic treatment, immunotherapies such as nivolumab, or TKIs such as sunitinib or pazopanib if immunotherapy isn't available. These agents are distinct from chemotherapy, and immunotherapy is increasingly recommended in guidelines for advanced and metastatic disease. This particular patient, with liver metastases, is not a surgical candidate, and a realistic prognosis should be given. Nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy is appropriate when disease is still localised or locally advanced, since a kidney tumour extending through the IVC is still considered as such, but once there are multiple metastases in the liver and elsewhere, surgery is not the right approach.

What are the best currently available anti-cancer therapies in India for advanced prostate cancer, and what role do targeted gene therapy and immunotherapy play?

The backbone remains continuous ADT, agents like degarelix or leuprolide, combined with newer anti-androgens such as abiraterone or enzalutamide, known as ARPIs (androgen receptor pathway inhibitors), plus genetic testing, where a BRCA mutation supports adding a PARP inhibitor such as olaparib, with many patients now on doublet, triplet or even quadruplet combinations rather than ADT alone. Oligometastatic (limited stage 4) disease confined mainly to the prostate and pelvis can still be surgically debulked alongside roughly one to one-and-a-half years of ADT; widespread stage 4 disease has no surgical indication. When these lines of treatment fail, options include immunotherapy, docetaxel- or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, and lutetium (PSMA) radioligand therapy, which tags rapidly-dividing, PSMA-expressing tumour cells for targeted internal radiotherapy, plus other immunotherapies such as pembrolizumab. Targeted gene therapy itself isn't yet in commercial clinical use, what is used is genetic testing to select the most effective molecule for a given patient's mutation profile, such as PARP inhibitors for BRCA2-positive cancer.

How should counselling be framed for patients with very advanced prostate cancer?

The patient needs a realistic sense of hope appropriate to their stage. A PSA above 1000 indicates metastatic disease, and in that setting the approach shifts from surgical cure to bringing the cancer under control with ADT and other systemic molecules.

What are the main steps of robotic radical prostatectomy?

Posterior dissection of the vas deferens and seminal vesicles, anterior dissection to the dorsal venous complex, division of the prostatovesical junction, removal of the prostate, a bladder-neck-preserving urethrovesical anastomosis, a leak test, and lymph node dissection.

When is the catheter typically removed after robotic radical prostatectomy?

After 7 to 10 days, once a leak test confirms a watertight anastomosis.

Need Expert Medical Guidance?

Connect with leading specialists through the Jivo Healthcare network for personalized advice.

Get Expert Opinion