Director, Department of Orthopaedics, CK Birla Hospital, Gurugram, India
Part 6 of 18 in Hip Replacement, Knee Replacement, Revision Surgery & Arthroscopies
Hip Resurfacing for Young and Active Patients
August 7, 2026
Hip resurfacing is a specialised alternative to standard total hip replacement, designed for young, athletic patients who need to continue high-demand activity after surgery, using a metal-on-metal bearing rather than ceramic components.
Why Do Athletes Need a Different Approach to Joint Replacement?
Dr. Ramkinkar Jha explains that athletic patients place far higher demands on a replaced joint than the general population, particularly through jumping and contact sports. Because greater activity increases wear on any implant and raises the chances of needing revision surgery later, the general advice given to joint replacement patients is to avoid running and jumping to protect the longevity of the implant.
What Is Hip Resurfacing and When Is It Used?
When changing activity levels is not realistic for a patient who wishes to continue sport, hip resurfacing offers a variation of joint replacement that preserves more of the natural femoral head, using a metal-on-metal bearing surface rather than standard components. This option is specifically favoured for athletes who are not willing or able to reduce their activity level after hip replacement.
Why Are Ceramic Implants Avoided in This Group?
Ceramic implants are generally not recommended for highly active or athletic patients because of a higher risk of breakage under repeated high-impact loading. For this specific group, hip resurfacing with a metal-on-metal bearing is considered the more suitable option among the choices available within joint replacement surgery.
← Complex and Revision Joint Replacement: High-Risk and Difficult Cases | Series index | Managing Infection After Joint Replacement →
This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Ramkinkar Jha, Chief and Unit Head, Orthopaedics, Artemis Hospitals, Gurgaon, India. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording
This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass — Dr. Ramkinkar Jha taught doctors across Africa on July 14, 2024.
FROM THE LIVE Q&A
Dr. Dennis
If a patient develops an infection around the implant, should the implant be removed or treated with antibiotics? And are there implants that are MRI-compatible?
Dr. Ramkinkar Jha
For infection: understand the kind and duration of it. If it's acute, be very aggressive — antibiotics alone won't suffice, don't hesitate to go inside and clean the joint, with multiple debridements till it feels clean; antibiotics work as an adjuvant, not the primary therapy. In the knee you can also change the polyethylene component, put a drain for three to five days, give antibiotics. But if it's longstanding — more than a month — you may need staged revision surgery: stage one, remove the implant and put an antibiotic spacer, monitor for six weeks until infection markers are normal and skin has healed, then stage two, the revision total replacement. On MRI: all joint replacements can have an MRI done, provided the implant is well fixed — if it's unstable, MRI may not be a good idea, but if the joint is stable, MRI can be done using implant-specific coils that neutralise the implant artefact.
Book a Consultation with Dr. Ramkinkar Jha
Book on WhatsAppOr message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you explain the '90 degree rule' for hip replacement surgery?▼
This is a common perception, actually — in the first six to eight weeks we don't want the patient to bend beyond 90 degrees, talking about hip replacements, to reduce the chances of dislocation so the capsule heals well. That's the 90 degree rule for hip replacement.
Based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system, what is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoarthritis — the presence of osteophytes, the absence of joint space, or both?▼
KL is just the WHO classification of osteoarthritis — it's not very good. Diagnosis is a clinical one: patients complaining of typical pain — pain while walking, pain while taking stairs, pain while sitting cross-legged — with definitive tenderness on the joint line, is almost confirmatory. That's the real gold standard, not the X-ray. X-ray is the baseline test, but it's not the criterion for deciding which patient should undergo surgery — a grade four KL arthritis patient with minimal pain treated well with physical therapy may not be a candidate for joint replacement, while a grade three patient who has tried all conservative measures without relief could be. It's a paradox, so X-ray grading alone isn't the gold standard. On location: for osteophytes, the location of weight-bearing matters more, but for me it's typically joint space reduction that matters most, because it indirectly shows the articular cartilage is gone — and that's irreversible.
How effective is medical therapy, and what is the role of steroids in early-stage osteoarthritis?▼
Medical therapy is the first line of treatment — it should be tried first, and once pain is not relieved with medical therapy and physical therapy, and the patient is having difficulty in activities of daily living, then the patient becomes a candidate for surgery.
What is the success rate of replacement therapy in terms of biocompatibility and durability?▼
The survivorship of newer implants, taking an average value, is more than 20 to 25 years, though there's a range. To measure success there's a prerequisite: we presume the patient has taken care of the joint, followed the precautions, physical therapies and exercises they've been told — the value I've mentioned is the average assuming that's been taken care of.
How often is the implant reviewed, and will it need to be removed, or is it permanent?▼
It's a permanent, non-removable procedure — it doesn't need to be removed. The follow-ups: the first milestone is at two weeks, to remove the stitches, then six weeks post-surgery, then three months, six months, and then annually.
What is hip resurfacing, and how does it differ from standard hip replacement?▼
It preserves more of the natural femoral head and uses a metal-on-metal bearing surface rather than the standard components used in total hip replacement.
Who is hip resurfacing typically recommended for?▼
Young, athletic patients who wish to continue high demand activity after surgery and are not willing or able to reduce their activity level.
Why are ceramic implants generally avoided for highly active patients?▼
Because of a higher risk of breakage under repeated high impact loading.
In This Series: Hip Replacement, Knee Replacement, Revision Surgery & Arthroscopies
- 1.Hip, Knee, Shoulder and Elbow Replacement
- 2.Arthroscopy: Keyhole Knee Surgery Explained
- 3.Complex and Revision Joint Replacement: High-Risk and Difficult Cases
- 4.Risks and Complications of Joint Replacement Surgery
- 5.The Goals of Total Joint Replacement Surgery
- 6.Hip Resurfacing for Young and Active Patients
- 7.Implant Materials in Joint Replacement: Metal, Ceramic and Gold
- 8.Implant Safety: MRI Compatibility, Follow-Up and Durability
- 9.Managing Infection After Joint Replacement
- 10.Joint Injections for Arthritis: Hyaluronic Acid, PRP, Stem Cells and Steroids
- 11.Who Is a Candidate for Joint Replacement? Age and Eligibility Criteria
- 12.Knee Osteotomy: Correcting Deformity Without Replacement
- 13.Non-Surgical Treatment for Osteoarthritis: Physiotherapy and Medication
- 14.How Is Osteoarthritis Diagnosed? X-rays, Grading and Clinical Assessment
- 15.Partial Knee Replacement: When One Compartment Is Affected
- 16.Conventional, Computer-Navigated and Robotic Knee Replacement Compared
- 17.Shoulder and Elbow Replacement: Indications and Outcomes
- 18.What Is Osteoarthritis? Understanding Joint Damage and Its Causes