Knee Osteotomy: Correcting Deformity Without Replacement

For infection: understand the kind and duration of it. If it's acute, be very aggressive — antibiotics alone won't suffice, don't hesitate to go inside and clean the joint, with multiple debridements till it feels clean; antibiotics work as an adjuvant, not the primary therapy. In the knee you can also change the polyethylene component, put a drain for three to five days, give antibiotics. But if it's longstanding — more than a month — you may need staged revision surgery: stage one, remove the implant and put an antibiotic spacer, monitor for six weeks until infection markers are normal and skin has healed, then stage two, the revision total replacement. On MRI: all joint replacements can have an MRI done, provided the implant is well fixed — if it's unstable, MRI may not be a good idea, but if the joint is stable, MRI can be done using implant-specific coils that neutralise the implant artefact.

This is a common perception, actually — in the first six to eight weeks we don't want the patient to bend beyond 90 degrees, talking about hip replacements, to reduce the chances of dislocation so the capsule heals well. That's the 90 degree rule for hip replacement.

KL is just the WHO classification of osteoarthritis — it's not very good. Diagnosis is a clinical one: patients complaining of typical pain — pain while walking, pain while taking stairs, pain while sitting cross-legged — with definitive tenderness on the joint line, is almost confirmatory. That's the real gold standard, not the X-ray. X-ray is the baseline test, but it's not the criterion for deciding which patient should undergo surgery — a grade four KL arthritis patient with minimal pain treated well with physical therapy may not be a candidate for joint replacement, while a grade three patient who has tried all conservative measures without relief could be. It's a paradox, so X-ray grading alone isn't the gold standard. On location: for osteophytes, the location of weight-bearing matters more, but for me it's typically joint space reduction that matters most, because it indirectly shows the articular cartilage is gone — and that's irreversible.

Medical therapy is the first line of treatment — it should be tried first, and once pain is not relieved with medical therapy and physical therapy, and the patient is having difficulty in activities of daily living, then the patient becomes a candidate for surgery.

The survivorship of newer implants, taking an average value, is more than 20 to 25 years, though there's a range. To measure success there's a prerequisite: we presume the patient has taken care of the joint, followed the precautions, physical therapies and exercises they've been told — the value I've mentioned is the average assuming that's been taken care of.

When X-rays show that only one compartment of the knee, most often the medial compartment, is involved in arthritis, while the rest of the joint remains reasonably healthy.

The bone below the knee is carefully cut and repositioned to change the alignment of the leg, opening up the damaged compartment and shifting load onto the healthier side of the joint.

It is a smaller, joint-preserving procedure generally suitable for younger, more active patients whose arthritis is confined to one compartment, but it is not a permanent solution for widespread arthritis.