Consultant, Medical Oncology, Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi
Series overview · 13 articles
From Detection to Recovery
September 6, 2026
Cancer care has moved a long way from the era when a diagnosis of stage four disease meant survival measured in months. Dr. Nithin S.G., a medical oncologist at Fortis Hospital, Vasant Kunj, walked doctors across Africa through the full arc of that shift: what to look for before a patient ever reaches an oncologist, how a suspected cancer is actually confirmed, and how precision oncology, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have changed what recovery looks like for patients who once had no real options. This guide introduces a complete series covering the detection, diagnosis and modern treatment of cancer.
Recognising Cancer Early
Most cancers announce themselves through symptoms that are easy to dismiss individually but form a recognisable pattern together: a change in bowel or bladder habits, a sore that will not heal, unusual bleeding or discharge, a thickening or lump, indigestion or difficulty swallowing, an obvious change in a wart or mole, and a nagging cough. Beyond these organ-specific warnings, unexplained weight loss of more than 10 kilograms in six months and persistent fatigue, even without any other symptom, are consistent enough across cancer types to justify testing on their own.
Confirming the Diagnosis
A blood test, imaging and tissue diagnosis each play a distinct role. Anaemia, an abnormal white cell or platelet count, deranged liver or kidney function and an elevated LDH can all point toward cancer before imaging is even ordered. Contrast-enhanced CT remains the workhorse scan for most cancers, MRI is reserved for suspected brain, uterine, rectal, bladder or prostate involvement, and a PET-CT adds whole-body staging, though it can light up infections such as tuberculosis just as readily as cancer. The tissue diagnosis itself should come from a core needle or excisional biopsy rather than FNAC, which yields too few cells to run the hormone receptor and genetic tests that now guide treatment. A small number of cancers, including confirmed liver masses in a cirrhotic patient, retinoblastoma in children, and swellings of the kidney or testis, are deliberately not biopsied at all, because the biopsy itself risks rupturing the tumour capsule and spreading the disease.
Staging Before Treatment
Once a diagnosis is confirmed, staging from one to four determines everything that follows. Stage one to three disease, confined to the organ of origin and nearby lymph nodes, is usually curable with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Stage four disease, where the cancer has spread to distant organs, is harder to control, and is where the newer forms of treatment covered in this series have made the most visible difference.
From Chemotherapy to Precision Oncology
Conventional chemotherapy works by attacking rapidly dividing cells, which is why it also damages bone marrow, hair follicles and the lining of the mouth and gut alongside the tumour. Two newer approaches now sit alongside it. Targeted therapy uses genetic testing, typically next generation sequencing, to identify the specific mutation driving an individual patient's cancer and match it to an oral drug that acts only on cells carrying that mutation, sparing healthy tissue and its side effects. Immunotherapy takes a different route, retraining the patient's own immune system to recognise and attack cancer cells it had previously been evading. Both approaches were illustrated by real cases from Dr. Nithin's own practice: a 55-year-old lung cancer patient with six to eight brain metastases who is alive and well three years after starting an EGFR-targeted tablet, and a 22-year-old sarcoma patient with metastases in her lung, liver and pelvis who has had no detectable disease for years on immunotherapy alone.
In This Series
The articles below cover the symptom checklist for common cancers, the blood tests and imaging used to confirm a diagnosis, why biopsy is preferred over FNAC, what tumour markers can and cannot tell you, cancer staging, precision oncology and genetic testing, immunotherapy, breast cancer subtypes and treatment, targeted therapy for patients in poor health, working up testicular and prostate cancer, liquid biopsy, and why uterine fibroids fall outside precision oncology altogether.
When to Suspect Cancer: A Symptom Checklist by Cancer Type | From Suspicion to Diagnosis: Blood Tests and Imaging Explained | Why Biopsy Beats FNAC in Cancer Diagnosis | Tumour Markers: What They Can and Cannot Tell You | Cancer Staging and Why It Decides the Treatment Plan | Precision Oncology: How Genetic Testing Is Changing Cancer Treatment | Immunotherapy: Retraining the Immune System to Fight Cancer | Breast Cancer: Subtypes, Diagnosis and Newer Targeted Treatments | Targeted Therapy for Advanced Cancer Patients with Poor Performance Status | Testicular Cancer, Prostate Cancer and PSA: Working Up Common Urologic Presentations | Liquid Biopsy: A Newer, Less Invasive Way to Detect and Monitor Cancer | Uterine Fibroids Are Not Cancer: Why Targeted Therapy Doesn't Apply
This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Nithin S.G., Consultant, Medical Oncology, Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording
This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass: Dr. Nithin S.G. taught doctors across Africa on May 11, 2025.
FROM THE LIVE Q&A
Dr. Isaia
How is breast cancer diagnosed based on its hormone receptor status?
Dr. Nithin S.G.
Breast cancer is broadly split into three types: hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive, and triple negative. The diagnostic procedure itself does not change based on subtype: a biopsy is still required, with mammography used only for initial evaluation. IHC testing on the biopsy sample determines ER, PR and HER2 status; if all three come back negative, the cancer is classed as triple negative, a more aggressive subtype that is harder to treat once it reaches stage four.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does mammography compare to MRI for diagnosing breast cancer?▼
Neither is simply better in every case. MRI is the more definitive test to rule out cancer, but mammography, a form of X-ray, can miss a tumour hidden in fattier breast tissue, which is common in women under 30 to 35. In younger women, ultrasound or MRI is preferred; mammography becomes more effective after around 35 to 40, once fibrous tissue outweighs fat. MRI is more accurate but costlier and more involved for the patient, which is why mammography is offered first, with a PET-CT or a CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis used for staging.
How effective is immunotherapy compared to other cancer medications?▼
Immunotherapy is highly effective and carries far fewer side effects than standard chemotherapy. In cancers with a large initial tumour burden, such as lung cancer, it is usually combined with chemotherapy at first, since immunotherapy alone takes time to bring a heavy disease burden under control. Once the disease responds, treatment continues on immunotherapy alone to maintain that response.
What specific investigation should be used to diagnose testicular cancer?▼
Any scrotal swelling should first be evaluated with ultrasound, which will show a testicular mass or enlargement, but there is no test that gives a confirmed diagnosis before surgery, that only comes after radical orchiectomy. Of 100 patients presenting with a testicular swelling, roughly 80 to 90 percent will have cancer and about 10 percent tuberculosis, so for the large majority a biopsy is avoided, since it risks spreading the cancer, in favour of going directly to orchiectomy. Tumour markers such as AFP and beta-hCG, elevated in seminoma and yolk-sac tumours, can support the ultrasound finding, but the standard recommendation regardless of marker levels is orchiectomy rather than biopsy.
How specific is PSA for prostate cancer, given a case where PSA was over 100 but the biopsy showed only BPH?▼
PSA is not specific for prostate cancer at all, no tumour marker is specific for any single cancer. An elevated PSA in a patient with a prostatic mass could reflect BPH or cancer, and can rise even after a digital rectal exam or ejaculation. Very high values, such as over 100, are more suggestive of cancer, so if PSA is extremely elevated yet the biopsy shows only BPH, the biopsy may simply have missed the cancerous core, which does happen. In such suspicious cases, a gallium-68 PSMA PET scan, highly specific for prostate cancer, can help confirm or rule out malignancy before treating for BPH alone.
Should breast cancer be diagnosed with a core biopsy or an excisional biopsy?▼
Core needle biopsy is sufficient for breast cancer, and there is no need for excisional biopsy in most cases. For a small tumour such as a fibroadenoma, excisional biopsy is an option, but core needle biopsy is equally effective, and if the mass proves benign, surgery can be avoided altogether.
What are the most consistent warning signs of cancer across different types?▼
Beyond organ-specific symptoms, unexplained weight loss of more than 10 kg in six months and persistent fatigue are consistent enough across cancer types to justify testing even without any other symptom.
Why is core or excisional biopsy preferred over FNAC for diagnosing cancer?▼
FNAC yields too few cells to run the hormone receptor and genetic tests that now guide treatment, while a core or excisional biopsy provides enough tissue for full histopathological and genetic workup.
Which cancers are deliberately not biopsied?▼
Confirmed liver masses in a cirrhotic patient, retinoblastoma in children, and swellings of the kidney or testis are not biopsied, because the biopsy itself risks rupturing the tumour capsule and spreading the disease.
What is the difference between targeted therapy and immunotherapy?▼
Targeted therapy uses genetic testing to match an oral drug to the specific mutation driving a patient's cancer, while immunotherapy retrains the patient's own immune system to recognise and attack cancer cells it had been evading.
Does a stage four cancer diagnosis still mean survival of only months?▼
Not always anymore. A lung cancer patient with six to eight brain metastases who is alive three years after starting an EGFR-targeted tablet shows how targeted therapy and immunotherapy have extended survival well beyond what chemotherapy alone once offered.
In This Series: From Detection to Recovery: Navigating the Future of Cancer Care
- 1.From Detection to Recovery
- 2.When to Suspect Cancer: A Symptom Checklist by Cancer Type
- 3.From Suspicion to Diagnosis: Blood Tests and Imaging Explained
- 4.Why Biopsy Beats FNAC in Cancer Diagnosis
- 5.Tumour Markers: What They Can and Cannot Tell You
- 6.Cancer Staging and Why It Decides the Treatment Plan
- 7.Precision Oncology: How Genetic Testing Is Changing Cancer Treatment
- 8.Immunotherapy: Retraining the Immune System to Fight Cancer
- 9.Breast Cancer: Subtypes, Diagnosis and Newer Targeted Treatments
- 10.Targeted Therapy for Advanced Cancer Patients with Poor Performance Status
- 11.Testicular Cancer, Prostate Cancer and PSA: Working Up Common Urologic Presentations
- 12.Liquid Biopsy: A Newer, Less Invasive Way to Detect and Monitor Cancer
- 13.Uterine Fibroids Are Not Cancer: Why Targeted Therapy Doesn't Apply