From Detection to Recovery: Navigating the Future of Cancer Care

May 11, 2025
Dr. Nithin S.G., a medical oncologist at Fortis Hospital, Vasant Kunj, walks doctors across Africa through the early warning signs of the most common cancers, the diagnostic workup that should follow, and how precision oncology, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are extending survival well beyond what chemotherapy alone once offered. Cases from his own practice, including a lung cancer patient with six to eight brain metastases who is alive three years later on an oral targeted tablet, and a soft tissue sarcoma patient with an ongoing complete response to immunotherapy, show how far personalised cancer treatment has come.
Questions Doctors Asked Dr. Nithin S.G.
Real questions from the live masterclass, answered by Dr. Nithin S.G., Consultant, Medical Oncology.
How is breast cancer diagnosed based on its hormone receptor status?
Asked by Dr. Isaia
Breast cancer is broadly split into three types: hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive, and triple negative. The diagnostic procedure itself does not change based on subtype: a biopsy is still required, with mammography used only for initial evaluation. IHC testing on the biopsy sample determines ER, PR and HER2 status; if all three come back negative, the cancer is classed as triple negative, a more aggressive subtype that is harder to treat once it reaches stage four.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
How does mammography compare to MRI for diagnosing breast cancer?
Asked by Dr. Isaia
Neither is simply better in every case. MRI is the more definitive test to rule out cancer, but mammography, a form of X-ray, can miss a tumour hidden in fattier breast tissue, which is common in women under 30 to 35. In younger women, ultrasound or MRI is preferred; mammography becomes more effective after around 35 to 40, once fibrous tissue outweighs fat. MRI is more accurate but costlier and more involved for the patient, which is why mammography is offered first, with a PET-CT or a CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis used for staging.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
How effective is immunotherapy compared to other cancer medications?
Asked by Dr. Isaia
Immunotherapy is highly effective and carries far fewer side effects than standard chemotherapy. In cancers with a large initial tumour burden, such as lung cancer, it is usually combined with chemotherapy at first, since immunotherapy alone takes time to bring a heavy disease burden under control. Once the disease responds, treatment continues on immunotherapy alone to maintain that response.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
What specific investigation should be used to diagnose testicular cancer?
Asked by Yaram
Any scrotal swelling should first be evaluated with ultrasound, which will show a testicular mass or enlargement, but there is no test that gives a confirmed diagnosis before surgery, that only comes after radical orchiectomy. Of 100 patients presenting with a testicular swelling, roughly 80 to 90 percent will have cancer and about 10 percent tuberculosis, so for the large majority a biopsy is avoided, since it risks spreading the cancer, in favour of going directly to orchiectomy. Tumour markers such as AFP and beta-hCG, elevated in seminoma and yolk-sac tumours, can support the ultrasound finding, but the standard recommendation regardless of marker levels is orchiectomy rather than biopsy.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
How specific is PSA for prostate cancer, given a case where PSA was over 100 but the biopsy showed only BPH?
Asked by Earam
PSA is not specific for prostate cancer at all, no tumour marker is specific for any single cancer. An elevated PSA in a patient with a prostatic mass could reflect BPH or cancer, and can rise even after a digital rectal exam or ejaculation. Very high values, such as over 100, are more suggestive of cancer, so if PSA is extremely elevated yet the biopsy shows only BPH, the biopsy may simply have missed the cancerous core, which does happen. In such suspicious cases, a gallium-68 PSMA PET scan, highly specific for prostate cancer, can help confirm or rule out malignancy before treating for BPH alone.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
Should breast cancer be diagnosed with a core biopsy or an excisional biopsy?
Asked by Mr. Reggerum
Core needle biopsy is sufficient for breast cancer, and there is no need for excisional biopsy in most cases. For a small tumour such as a fibroadenoma, excisional biopsy is an option, but core needle biopsy is equally effective, and if the mass proves benign, surgery can be avoided altogether.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
Can precision oncology or targeted therapy offer a drug for uterine fibroids, since they are so common?
Asked by Doctor on the call (name unclear from transcript)
Unfortunately there is no specific genetic mutation identified for uterine fibroids and no targeted drug role for them, since fibroids are benign tumours, not cancers. Treatment options remain limited to hormonal therapy or surgery.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
What is your opinion on targeted therapy for advanced cancer patients with a poor performance status?
Asked by Mr. Hannibal
Targeted therapy's main advantage is that it is mostly oral medication without the classic side effects of chemotherapy, so it remains a reasonable option even in poor performance status, though this depends on the specific drug and its side-effect profile rather than being a blanket rule. Two cases illustrate this: a metastatic lung cancer patient with brain metastases who was bedridden with severe headache and vomiting, and a metastatic breast cancer patient with cerebellar metastasis causing incoordination, both showed marked improvement on targeted therapy despite their poor baseline state. Overall, more patients in poor performance status can be treated with targeted therapy than with chemotherapy, since chemotherapy is often not feasible in a very poor clinical state.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
What is the difference between FNAC, core biopsy and excisional biopsy?
Asked by Doctor on the call (name unclear from transcript)
FNAC (fine needle aspiration cytology) involves inserting a needle into a tumour or fluid-filled cyst and aspirating fluid along with a few detached cells for slide evaluation under a microscope; sensitivity is low since so few cells come through, and a pathologist can typically only confirm abnormal cells are present, not the exact cancer subtype needed for hormone receptor and HER2 testing. Core biopsy uses a biopsy gun that removes a cylindrical piece of tissue roughly a centimetre long, providing enough tissue for full histopathological and genetic workup, which is why core biopsy, not FNAC, is preferred whenever cancer is suspected.
Answered by Dr. Nithin S.G.
Read the Full Article Series
- 1.From Detection to Recovery: A Complete Guide to Modern Cancer Care
- 2.When to Suspect Cancer: A Symptom Checklist by Cancer Type
- 3.From Suspicion to Diagnosis: Blood Tests and Imaging Explained
- 4.Why Biopsy Beats FNAC in Cancer Diagnosis
- 5.Tumour Markers: What They Can and Cannot Tell You
- 6.Cancer Staging and Why It Decides the Treatment Plan
- 7.Precision Oncology: How Genetic Testing Is Changing Cancer Treatment
- 8.Immunotherapy: Retraining the Immune System to Fight Cancer
- 9.Breast Cancer: Subtypes, Diagnosis and Newer Targeted Treatments
- 10.Targeted Therapy for Advanced Cancer Patients with Poor Performance Status
- 11.Testicular Cancer, Prostate Cancer and PSA: Working Up Common Urologic Presentations
- 12.Liquid Biopsy: A Newer, Less Invasive Way to Detect and Monitor Cancer
- 13.Uterine Fibroids Are Not Cancer: Why Targeted Therapy Doesn't Apply