OncologyDr. Nithin S.G.Cancer Diagnosis & Treatment

Consultant, Medical Oncology, Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi

Part 13 of 13 in From Detection to Recovery: Navigating the Future of Cancer Care

Uterine Fibroids Are Not Cancer: Why Targeted Therapy Doesn't Apply

September 6, 2026

A question that came up directly during Dr. Nithin S.G.'s masterclass, whether precision oncology could offer a targeted drug for uterine fibroids given how common they are, has a simple answer with an important distinction behind it.

Fibroids Are Benign, Not Malignant

Uterine fibroids, despite being extremely common, are benign tumours, not cancer. Precision oncology and targeted therapy are built around identifying a genetic mutation driving a malignant cancer and matching it to a drug, and no specific genetic mutation has been identified for uterine fibroids the way one has for many cancers. That absence of a target is precisely why no targeted drug exists for them.

What Actually Treats Fibroids

Without a genetic target to aim at, fibroid treatment remains limited to two established options: hormonal therapy or surgery. This is not a gap in current research so much as a reflection of what fibroids fundamentally are, a benign hormone-responsive growth rather than a genetically driven malignancy, so the entire precision oncology toolkit built for cancer simply has no foothold there.

Why the Distinction Matters for Referring Doctors

For a referring doctor evaluating a patient with fibroids, the practical takeaway is straightforward: don't expect a targeted-therapy option to emerge for a fibroid the way one might for a genetically driven cancer. Hormonal management or surgical removal remain the standard of care, and a patient should be counselled accordingly rather than referred for oncology-style genetic testing that has nothing to act on in this condition.

← Liquid Biopsy: A Newer, Less Invasive Way to Detect and Monitor Cancer | Series index

This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Nithin S.G., Consultant, Medical Oncology, Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording

This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass: Dr. Nithin S.G. taught doctors across Africa on May 11, 2025.

FROM THE LIVE Q&A

YA

Yaram

What specific investigation should be used to diagnose testicular cancer?

NS

Dr. Nithin S.G.

Any scrotal swelling should first be evaluated with ultrasound, which will show a testicular mass or enlargement, but there is no test that gives a confirmed diagnosis before surgery, that only comes after radical orchiectomy. Of 100 patients presenting with a testicular swelling, roughly 80 to 90 percent will have cancer and about 10 percent tuberculosis, so for the large majority a biopsy is avoided, since it risks spreading the cancer, in favour of going directly to orchiectomy. Tumour markers such as AFP and beta-hCG, elevated in seminoma and yolk-sac tumours, can support the ultrasound finding, but the standard recommendation regardless of marker levels is orchiectomy rather than biopsy.

See all 9 questions from this masterclass →

Book a Consultation with Dr. Nithin S.G.

Book on WhatsApp

Or message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669

Frequently Asked Questions

How specific is PSA for prostate cancer, given a case where PSA was over 100 but the biopsy showed only BPH?

PSA is not specific for prostate cancer at all, no tumour marker is specific for any single cancer. An elevated PSA in a patient with a prostatic mass could reflect BPH or cancer, and can rise even after a digital rectal exam or ejaculation. Very high values, such as over 100, are more suggestive of cancer, so if PSA is extremely elevated yet the biopsy shows only BPH, the biopsy may simply have missed the cancerous core, which does happen. In such suspicious cases, a gallium-68 PSMA PET scan, highly specific for prostate cancer, can help confirm or rule out malignancy before treating for BPH alone.

Should breast cancer be diagnosed with a core biopsy or an excisional biopsy?

Core needle biopsy is sufficient for breast cancer, and there is no need for excisional biopsy in most cases. For a small tumour such as a fibroadenoma, excisional biopsy is an option, but core needle biopsy is equally effective, and if the mass proves benign, surgery can be avoided altogether.

Can precision oncology or targeted therapy offer a drug for uterine fibroids, since they are so common?

Unfortunately there is no specific genetic mutation identified for uterine fibroids and no targeted drug role for them, since fibroids are benign tumours, not cancers. Treatment options remain limited to hormonal therapy or surgery.

What is your opinion on targeted therapy for advanced cancer patients with a poor performance status?

Targeted therapy's main advantage is that it is mostly oral medication without the classic side effects of chemotherapy, so it remains a reasonable option even in poor performance status, though this depends on the specific drug and its side-effect profile rather than being a blanket rule. Two cases illustrate this: a metastatic lung cancer patient with brain metastases who was bedridden with severe headache and vomiting, and a metastatic breast cancer patient with cerebellar metastasis causing incoordination, both showed marked improvement on targeted therapy despite their poor baseline state. Overall, more patients in poor performance status can be treated with targeted therapy than with chemotherapy, since chemotherapy is often not feasible in a very poor clinical state.

What is the difference between FNAC, core biopsy and excisional biopsy?

FNAC (fine needle aspiration cytology) involves inserting a needle into a tumour or fluid-filled cyst and aspirating fluid along with a few detached cells for slide evaluation under a microscope; sensitivity is low since so few cells come through, and a pathologist can typically only confirm abnormal cells are present, not the exact cancer subtype needed for hormone receptor and HER2 testing. Core biopsy uses a biopsy gun that removes a cylindrical piece of tissue roughly a centimetre long, providing enough tissue for full histopathological and genetic workup, which is why core biopsy, not FNAC, is preferred whenever cancer is suspected.

Is there a targeted drug available for uterine fibroids?

No. No specific genetic mutation has been identified for uterine fibroids, so precision oncology's targeted-drug approach, built around matching a drug to a cancer's genetic mutation, has nothing to target in fibroids.

Are uterine fibroids cancerous?

No. Uterine fibroids are benign tumours, not cancer, which is why they fall outside the precision oncology and targeted therapy approaches used for malignant disease.

What are the standard treatment options for uterine fibroids?

Hormonal therapy or surgery remain the two established treatment options for uterine fibroids.

Need Expert Medical Guidance?

Connect with leading specialists through the Jivo Healthcare network for personalized advice.

Get Expert Opinion