CardiologyDr. Z S MeharwalCardiac Surgery

Chairman & Head - Adult Cardiac Surgery, Fortis Escorts, New Delhi, India

Part 15 of 16 in Advances in Cardiac Surgeries

Third-Generation Tissue Valves and Valve-in-Valve Technology

August 5, 2026

Third-generation tissue heart valves, used to treat valvular heart disease, are designed to degenerate more slowly than earlier generations and to make a future valve-in-valve procedure easier if the valve does eventually wear out. These developments are changing how surgeons and patients think about tissue valves for heart valve surgery in India.

Newer tissue valves used today

Third-generation tissue valves in use today include the Inspiris valve from Medtronic, the Myval valve from the Indian company Meril, the Perceval valve from the UK-based company Corcym, and the Intuity valve from Edwards. These valves build on decades of research into reducing structural valve degeneration, the main reason older tissue valves needed to be replaced for valvular heart disease.

Why manufacturers focus on anti-calcification treatment

Tissue valve degeneration is caused mainly by calcification of the valve tissue, and most manufacturers have focused their research on anti-calcification treatments to slow this process. Slower calcification means the valve lasts longer before it needs to be replaced, which matters most for younger patients with valvular heart disease, since tissue valves degenerate faster in younger patients than in older ones.

How valve-in-valve technology avoids repeat open heart surgery

Because every tissue valve will eventually degenerate, manufacturers are also developing technology that makes it easier to implant a new valve inside an old one using a catheter, without repeat open heart surgery. Edwards has developed fluoroscopically visible markers, so doctors can see the size of the previously implanted valve during a future procedure, along with an expansion zone in the valve's sewing ring that allows a larger replacement valve to be used later. Abbott's Epic valve carries similar radiopaque markers in both its leaflets and its stent posts, visible under fluoroscopy, for the same purpose. Dr. Z. S. Meharwal at Fortis Escorts Heart Institute notes that for patients who receive heart valve surgery in India while young, valve-in-valve technology means a future valve replacement may not require open heart surgery again.

← Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery: Less Pain, Faster Recovery | Series index | Sutureless Heart Valves: A Faster, Less Invasive Alternative →

This article is based on a Jivo Masterclass session conducted by Dr. Z. S. Meharwal, Chairman and Head, Adult Cardiac Surgery, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi. The article has been summarised with the assistance of an AI tool from the original masterclass recording. Watch the full Masterclass recording

This guide is based on a live Jivo Masterclass — Dr. Z S Meharwal taught doctors across Africa on October 26, 2025.

FROM THE LIVE Q&A

HO

Host (Varun, Jivo Healthcare)

What is the financial implication of these surgeries, whether mechanical or tissue-based valve replacement?

ZS

Dr. Z S Meharwal

Cost primarily depends on two things: which valve is used — mechanical valves are significantly less expensive than tissue valves, and among tissue valves, third-generation valves cost more than second-generation ones — and the patient's clinical course, since a straightforward surgery without a long hospital stay or comorbidities costs less. The average cost generally starts from $9,000 and goes up to $15,000–$16,000.

See all 6 questions from this masterclass →

Book a Consultation with Dr. Z S Meharwal

Book on WhatsApp

Or message us on WhatsApp: +91 98182 98669

Frequently Asked Questions

For a child born with a non-obstructing mass over the apical side of the heart, around 1.4 cm by 1 cm, with no sign of heart failure — the baby is now 3 months old, echo is otherwise normal except for the mass, which is likely a rhabdomyoma on differential, and has shown some decrease in size (from 1.4x1 cm to 1.2x0 cm over a month) — should we consider surgical management, or when should surgical management be considered?

Cardiac tumours in children are well known, though this exact pathology is not very common. The echo gives us an idea, but I would suggest also doing an MRI and a CT to further delineate it. I would like the details of this patient sent to our institute so we can forward it to our paediatric cardiac surgeon, since paediatric cardiac surgery is a separate subspecialty from the adult cardiac surgery I practise, and we do have a dedicated paediatric cardiac surgical team. This child needs very close follow-up and further investigation.

For a tetralogy of Fallot patient where surgery was not done at an early age and the patient is now around 6 years old, what is the survival rate if surgery is not done, and what is the success rate of surgery done now?

Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the commonest surgical procedures, and the outcome depends on the exact anatomy delineated by a proper paediatric echo, but six years is not a very late stage — in India a lot of patients are operated on at this age or even older. The outcome of tetralogy repair even at 6 years is excellent, so this patient certainly needs surgical correction.

An adult patient with myocardial bridging is on a beta blocker — should surgery be done, and if surgery is not done, what are the possible negative complications?

Myocardial bridging is not uncommon and is often seen on angiography. If it is asymptomatic, nothing needs to be done. If it is symptomatic, we normally do a stress thallium test — if positive, we recommend surgery; if negative, which is most of the time, only medical treatment is needed. If it is only myocardial bridging with no stenosis involved in other arteries (the circumflex or right coronary artery are normal), nothing needs to be done, but if the stress test is positive, surgery is recommended.

What is the place of surgery in children with tetralogy of Fallot?

Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the commonest procedures in paediatric cardiac surgery, alongside ASD and VSD repair. It is a very commonly performed procedure with excellent outcomes — any paediatric cardiac centre does this routinely, and the clinical outcomes are excellent.

What is the most common dilemma doctors practising in resource-constrained environments like Africa face: how do they decide whether a case should be handled locally or referred across the border for specialist intervention?

The patient should be referred for further evaluation at the appropriate time — not too early, but also not too late, because if it is too late the patient develops more comorbidities and the outcome may not be as good. For valve disease specifically, there are definite guidelines for mitral and aortic valve disease on when a patient should be referred for cardiac surgery; whether it can be done locally depends on whether it looks like a straightforward repair or replacement, or a more challenging one. The two important criteria are the patient's clinical symptoms — which functional class (1, 2, 3, or 4) — and the echo findings, which show the severity of stenosis or regurgitation, LV function, and pulmonary artery pressures. Together these decide whether the patient should be referred for surgical treatment, locally or elsewhere.

What are examples of third-generation tissue heart valves used today?

Third-generation tissue valves in use today include the Inspiris valve from Medtronic, the Myval valve from the Indian company Meril, the Perceval valve from the UK-based company Corcym, and the Intuity valve from Edwards.

Why do valve manufacturers focus research on anti-calcification treatments?

Tissue valve degeneration is caused mainly by calcification of the valve tissue, so slowing calcification through anti-calcification treatment means the valve lasts longer before it needs to be replaced, which matters most for younger patients since tissue valves degenerate faster in younger patients than in older ones.

What is valve-in-valve technology?

Valve-in-valve technology allows a new valve to be implanted inside an old, degenerated valve using a catheter, without repeat open heart surgery.

How do fluoroscopically visible markers help with future valve procedures?

Edwards has developed fluoroscopically visible markers so doctors can see the size of a previously implanted valve during a future procedure, along with an expansion zone in the valve's sewing ring that allows a larger replacement valve to be used later. Abbott's Epic valve carries similar radiopaque markers in its leaflets and stent posts for the same purpose.

Need Expert Medical Guidance?

Connect with leading specialists through the Jivo Healthcare network for personalized advice.

Get Expert Opinion