Robotic and Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

What I am doing here is coronary artery bypass surgery, and the job of the robot for coronary artery bypass surgery is to take down the two mammary arteries with the help of the robot and then do the bypass, and direct valve repair and replacement with the robot. We also do atrial septal defect closure and removal of myxomas. Some surgeons have now started doing valve replacement with the robot, but I am not doing that. I'm not comfortable with it.

For young patients, since in minimally invasive surgery we usually cannulate the femoral artery and vein, patients less than six years old have very small femoral arteries, so we avoid the minimal access approach in very young children. After six years, I have done ASD closure in a 7-year-old, putting in a 14 French femoral cannula, so up to about 3.2mm femoral artery size is appropriate for cannulation; less than that is not good. For older patients, the contraindications I already mentioned apply, such as atheromatous changes in the femoral artery, which is not good for cannulation, or changes in the ascending aorta, such as calcification, which is again not a good aorta for this. That's why beforehand we do a Doppler study of the femoral artery and vein to see the size and any lesions, and a CT scan to see the ascending aorta and the tortuosity of the iliac vessels.

Minimally invasive surgery is definitely costlier than regular surgery because we use specially designed instruments, and robotic surgery is even more costly because the robotic instruments and system are costly. So it's going to be costlier, maybe one and a half times than regular surgery, but you gain more: you can start working in three weeks instead of losing three months, there is less pain, early hospital discharge, less blood loss and less ICU stay. So these are the advantages, but definitely minimally invasive and robotic surgery is more expensive than conventional surgery.

There are two things: technique and technology. Even though you are trained, you should also have the hardware in your country; a robotic system is very expensive, but I am currently operating on some patients from Ethiopia and they are affording the minimally invasive and robotic surgery they ask for. You are welcome to come and have a short visit, maybe one week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks, whatever you can manage, and get trained. If you require, we can go and proctor you for a few cases there too. Before that, if you have patients, definitely refer them; you can come with the patient, watch, and that is the way to train. You can't become a minimally invasive or robotic surgeon in day one. Before I started I must have visited 15 countries across Europe and North America to get trained, and then I was proctored by surgeons across the world at some of the best centres. I have done around 3,500 minimally invasive cardiac surgeries and around 7,700 robotic surgeries. We also formed a society, so you can come and participate in our annual meeting. We are going to very soon start a fellowship program through our society, and we can give some financial assistance to people who are interested in this area, though that will be a visiting fellowship for a week or so.

Yes, with the help of a robot we can unroof the myocardial bridge without opening the chest. It's possible, provided we can locate the exact site of the bridge, and this is absolutely the best way to go, because we are not going to open the chest. With the robot, we unbridge that segment of the LIMA and remove the bridging myocardium.